Fair Compensation and Private Copying Levy: ECJ stance in Padawan v SGAE


The European Court of Justice (ECJ) recently delivered an important judgement on the private copying levy (see Padawan SL v Sociedad General de Autores y Editores (SGAE) (Case C-467/08), ruling of 21 October 2010).

It was the first time the ECJ dealt with this issue. It did so when interpreting certain provisions of the Info-Society Directive (2001/29) which cover the exception to the reproduction right (one of the exclusive rights offered to copyright owners) for private uses and non commercial purposes. One of the provisions interpreted by the ECJ was Article 5(2)(b) of the above directive. It states this exception may be introduced by EU Member States provided that a fair compensation is paid to right holders. Almost all EU countries compensate the copyright owner by imposing a private copying levy on the sellers of copying equipment – i.e. products capable of being used for making copies, such as MP3 players, DVDs, CDs, etc. – and by channelling the relevant proceeds to the former.

The case originated from Spanish proceedings instituted by SGAE, the national collecting society, against Padawan, a distributor of copying devices. The latter had refused to pay the former the private copying levy, arguing that the way the levy was applied was discriminatory: indeed, the levy indiscriminately applied to both private persons and companies/professionals who purchased the equipment in question.

Four main conclusions can be drawn by examining ECJ’ reasoning in Padawan v SGAE.

(i) The fair compensation envisaged by Article 5(2)(b) Info-Society Directive should aim to compensate copyright owners “adequately”. Its quantification should take into consideration the harm suffered by right holders as a consequence of the unauthorized reproduction of their works by users.

(ii) Private copying levies are compliant with the Info-Society Directive. On the one hand, there is no doubt the levy directly applies to the distributor of copying devices and not to the user of such devices. Yet on the other hand, the ECJ stressed, the former can pass on to the latter the levy paid by augmenting the price charged to him. Therefore the user will be – ultimately and indirectly – the person liable to pay the fair compensation. This is in line with Recital 31 Info-Society Directive according to which a fair balance between the rights of copyright owners and the interests of users should be struck.

(iii) The Court also dealt with the issue of “objective suitability” of equipment for private copying. In a nutshell, it was held that for the levy to apply it is not necessary to show that the individual has effectively made a copy of the copyrighted work; in this regard, a presumption that the purchaser of the equipment will use it for making copies applies.

(iv) Finally – and this is the most relevant issue of the ruling – the ECJ found that the levy should apply exclusively to sales of copying devices to individuals who use them for making private copies, and not to equipment sold to companies and professionals (that undoubtedly purchase them for purposes different from private copying).

This ruling will have an impact on those countries which have introduced private copying levies and have not provided any exemptions in relation to sales of copying devices to companies and professionals (e.g. Italy had already introduced such exemptions). Such states will therefore have to modify the relevant legislation by following the guidelines given by the ECJ in Padawan v SGAE.

Share this article!

About Author


  1. Usually when I’m looking for some information from the field did not look into the blogs. The general opinion is lingering argument that blogs teenagers who have problems with them during puberty. That is why so much unnecessary information in them and nothing you can learn. But it is also worth a bit more to figure out in what gives us a virtual space, because we find it much more interesting things. Sam very surprised when I found out that blogs can be something other than just the diaries, but it turned out that you can find some very valuable pages of this type. Therefore I dare to recommend this blog. There are a lot of interesting information which may well expand their knowledge and make our field of interest has expanded strongly. So definitely worth a look at this blog. It is ideal for anyone who is interested in this topic. This blog has many interesting categories, which contain a variety of texts, to which it is worth noting. At the beginning I did not believe that so powerful a blog can provide greater value, it turned out, however, that this is possible. On this blog, despite the wealth of content, they are very well developed and you can see that verified. Therefore, we need not fear that someone just a everything pozmyslal. This is undoubtedly a great asset to this blog, and we appreciate it, because in the virtual space, it happens very rarely. This blog is also an interesting adventure, not only for those who are up on this subject, but also for those who are in contact with her for the first time. Therefore, if we are in the field zupelnymi amateurs and we do not have the foggiest idea, we need not worry. Certainly not exclude a page after a few seconds, discouraged by obscurity submitted content. This blog is suitable for anyone, so regardless of the state of our knowledge, we are interested in it. Certainly not regret his decision, and this blog will give us valuable information that can not be found on another website.

  2. In my life I watched the thousands, nay – tens of thousands of different websites. Today I have no doubt that it is difficult to get a really good blog. Usually this type of sites dealing with children who rely on free scripts, free servers, and write to all of this do not know what – even the same can not say why these blogs are. Therefore, with a large dose of skepticism is always approached for this kind of web sites and always willing to write on any kind of forums about their fears. This time, however, want to share a slightly different observation. In the header I put a link to a site that few days ago, particularly caught my attention. Why? This issue of the same content, which in such cases often doubt. I do not know who started this blog est, stretchers, however, intended to write an email to the admin of this site. Blog content because they are not only well-communicated, are reliable and very unique. I always wondered whether people with great knowledge of playing in the blogging. After reading the same blog I am inclined to say yes. I can say even more – not just to have fun, but even on these blogs work. In this specific topic I was looking for information for many months. On the website of well-known e-publishing is really very little reliable information and in particular the information communicated well, I sat in the reading libraries also that the press can find some interesting things. Usually it ended with disappointment and a waste of time. Then suddenly a few days ago I found through a link on the pages of this blog and immediately fell in love with it. So many great knowledge in one place, even e found. So if anyone is interested in the subject (as in the address), I recommend reading a bit of publication of this page. It is really worth.

Leave A Reply